The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart provide information about fish and meat consumption in Europe.
Overall, it can be seen that consumption of chicken increased, while consumption of the other three foods decreased over the period shown.
Looking at the chart in more detail, it is evident that amount of chicken which was consumed increased from 140grams/person/week(g/p/w) in 1979 to 250g/p/w in 2004. which was the highest point on the chart. In contrast, consumption of beef decreased from 220g/p/w in 1979 to 100g/p/w in 2004.
Turning to the remaining two data sets, it can be seen that the amount of lamb which was eaten started at 150g/p/w in 1979, and shrank to approximately 60g/p/w in 2004. Consumption of fish showed the smallest change. It decreased from about 60g/p/w to about 40g/p/w over the 25-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Lovepreet123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | anasrafiq | 73 | view |
- In recent years, the structure of a family and the roles of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- In recent years, the structure of a family and the roles of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 61
- In recent years, the structure of a family and the roles of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 56
- New technologies have changed the way children their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
.../weekg/p/w in 1979 to 250g/p/w in 2004. which was the highest point on the chart. In ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
.../weekg/p/w in 1979 to 250g/p/w in 2004. which was the highest point on the chart. In ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 681.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 131.0 196.424390244 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19847328244 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.38312328216 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14474170395 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549618320611 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 167.4 283.868780488 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3226954008 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.125 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142936780456 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765245097185 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653888269143 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10018874542 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458671530886 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.