The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates changes fish and some animal ‘s meat consumed in a particular European country from 1979 to 2004. It can be seen from the graph that, chicken became the most popular meat while the others consumption went down during this period of time.

In 1979, the consumption of beef came top of the list with 200 grams per week while chicken and lamp stood at about 150 grams. In addition fish was the least favorite food, the fish consumed by a person in a week was just over 50 grams, this number was less than 4 time than the beef was consumed.

25 years later, while the consumption of beef and lamp declined sharply to just over 100 grams and 50 grams, the chicken consumed by a person per week surged rapidly to just sort of 250 grams and became the most popular. Besides, the consumption of fish was hoverd around 50 grams and this figure remained stable during 25 years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-18 olParya 73 view
2019-09-03 nhaxquyeen 89 view
2019-04-17 armiez 78 view
2019-03-31 Dương Văn Biên 73 view
2019-03-06 hieu1910199512 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... became the most popular meat while the others consumption went down during this perio...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...thers consumption went down during this period of time. In 1979, the consumption of beef ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...n and lamp stood at about 150 grams. In addition fish was the least favorite food, the f...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, so, while, in addition, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 746.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5487804878 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17651326531 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55487804878 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.9489136812 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132927108214 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082130601156 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817035176068 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103442855608 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783797867534 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.