The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates the information about three types of daily person-consumed spreads in a nation between 1981 and 2007. Overall, there was a significant decline in both margarine and low-fat and reduced spreads, while butter fluctuated erratically. In addition, the number of low-fat was the highest figure at the end of the period.
margarine was initially the highest number of spreads consumed. it stood at around 142 grams. The figure reached the peaks in the next following years at approximately 158 grams. After that, it decreased sharply to about 69 grams in 1996 and this followed by a gradual decline to about 60 grams at the end of reported-year.
The figure of low-fat and reduced spreads was initially a half of that of margarine and, in 1986, it slightly dropped to around 80 grams. following which, the figure witnessed an incline to d the similar number that of margarine in 1991 (100 grams), before observed a flat change for five years. Lastly, in 2007, the figure went down to about 70 grams.
butter was originally used in 1996 and experienced a substantial rise to more than 80 grams in 2001. At the end of the period, it accounted for 40 grams per person.
- People Participate in IELTS Program in 6 English Courses in Pare, 2016 78
- Some People believe that to be successful at a sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- he two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feat 73
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- Scientists predict that in the future cars will be driven by computers.What are the reasons behind this? Is it a positive or negative development? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Margarine
...est figure at the end of the period. margarine was initially the highest number of spr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...the highest number of spreads consumed. it stood at around 142 grams. The figure r...
^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...it slightly dropped to around 80 grams. following which, the figure witnessed an incline ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Butter
... figure went down to about 70 grams. butter was originally used in 1996 and experie...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85221674877 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76635965836 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532019704433 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6310000733 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0833333333 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9166666667 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0642454305937 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272592444606 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501463507388 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0400886009547 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035127841824 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.