The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The line chart provides information about the proportion of senior citizen in japan, Sweden and the United States during a century from 1940 to 2040. Overall, there is an upward trend in all countries and it is predicted that japan will rank first at the end of the period.
In the first year, the figure for senior citizen in japan was the lowest, and it stood at precisely 5% followed by a slight decrease of about 3% in 1960. Between 1960 and 1980, the number was unchange at around 3%, then it started to rise moderately in the following year. After which, it is predicted that the quantity will reach 10% along with a dramatic rise to the peak of a number of more than 25% in the final year.
The USA and Sweden began the period just below 10% (approximately 9% and 7% respectively). In the following 40 years, both countries increased markedly of about 15% and 14% each, then the share of Sweden surpassed that of America in 2000 (15%) before it rose significantly of about 20% in 2019. The number of Elderly people in Sweden is estimated to increase more than 25% in 2040, while the figure for the theUSA will account just below 25%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | Tania uppal | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Jass kahlon | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Pamela K | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | cindycornelia98 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
- The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart shows unemployment rate and the number of people leaving Ireland from 1988 to 2008. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51442307692 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39150195898 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.730430765 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.375 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0730288999708 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347417921424 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303126615728 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531917823946 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252773314457 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.