The graph provides information about the contribution of agriculture, manufacturing and business and financial to the UK economy through the twentieth century.
We can see from the data that agriculture had the most effect on the UK economy from 1900 to 1950, in comparison with business and financial sector with the least contribution at the same years.
In contrast, the proportion of agriculture and business and financial sectors completely changed in the last ten years. The proportion of agriculture decreased significantly from 10% in 1975 to near zero in 2000. However the proportion of the other sector is doubled through these years.
Furthermore, the contribution of manufacturing was slightly declined from almost 45% to approximately 20% through the whole century.
Generally; in the twentieth century, as the contribution of agriculture and manufacturing sectors towards the UK economy decreased, the business and financial part made a major contribution to the economy.
- University education should be free. Do you agree or disagree? Why? Use examples and reasons to develop your argument. 73
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors - agriculture, manufacturing and business and financial services - to the UK economy in the twentieth century. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and the comparis 56
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors - agriculture, manufacturing and business and financial services - to the UK economy in the twentieth century. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and the comparis 56
- Dubai Gold Sales in 2002 78
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors - agriculture, manufacturing and business and financial services - to the UK economy in the twentieth century. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and the comparis 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... from 10% in 1975 to near zero in 2000. However the proportion of the other sector is d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32382644286 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513333333333 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7687175941 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330503032623 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167016276384 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154858986153 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218616282457 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15232961055 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.