The graph compares amount of money spending on leisure activities in Asia, Europe and the USA between 1995 and 2000.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that much more money has been spent on fun activities in later years and always cinema is the lowest money taker. Additionally, American have disbursed by far more than others.
Looking at details, despite both television and publishing almost took %80 of entertainment breakdown, music, video and cinema in total only took the rest of proportion in all nation groups. Furthermore, cinema was the least interesting with less than one out of ten proportion of whole spending amount of money in each year and country.
Regarding to comparison in total after half decade, the amount of money that Asian spent in 1995 increased significantly at 67 to 110 billion dollars. Meanwhile, European experienced a significant growth, rising at 97 to 131. Finally, from 1995 to 2000 in The United States amount of spending money increased considerably at 184 to 257 billion dollars.
- The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980. 11
- One of your friends is planning to visit your country and asking you for some information Write a letter to him her and say When the best period to visit your country is suggest a plan for the travel recommend places to visit in your country 42
- A letter You are a university student living in on campus accommodation You are having some problems with the internet connection in your room Write to the supervisor of your residence in your letter introduce yourselfinform him her of the situationrequ 82
- Essay topics: You recently moved to a new apartment. Write to your friend and say- Why did you move there- Describe the new apartment- Invite him/her to visit you 73
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups. However, sharing personal information on social media websites does have risks.Do you think that the advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12941176471 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76067290328 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629411764706 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.084286198 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148883262076 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604876631417 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538133024848 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894496522168 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029821334574 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.