The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant.
A comparison of first-year English and French teachers’ recruitment according to graduation year from 2001 to 2007 in Ontario and is measured in percentage is illustrated in the line graph. Overall, both figures stood at fairly similar proportion, but the figure for French-language teachers had successfully overtaken that for English ones in the end of period. An immense gap between those had widened out.
Initially, both started at virtually 70% success rate in finding jobs (while French teachers had less successful compared to the English ones). A Considerable fall in the number of new graduates applying for English teachers accounted for 28% while there was a slight rise of applicants for French teachers, with 72%.
A closer look at the graph reveals that 2003 experienced a major change in the graph. Interestingly, while the percentage of English-teacher job seekers decreased continuously to 40%, the percentage of first-year French teachers rose significantly to 68%. This finally was able to surpass English-teachers’ trend. Despite of the fluctuation shown in the figures, the trend was ended by the widening gap for both teaching jobs and French teachers’ figure represented as the highest.
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 80
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51851851852 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40791675184 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4759792197 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.888888889 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107411610502 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518950897073 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495938304132 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805164689077 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445809243105 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.