The given chart illustrates about three ways to dispose the waste include in landfill, burning dumping in sea in three years 2005, 2006 and 2008. The units are measured in million ton. As we can see in 2005 and 2006 the landfill method was the most used until 2008 it was dominated by dumping in sea method. While burning method always the least popular way.
In 2005, the figure of landfill method was double amount ( approximately 2000 million ton ) of burning and dumping in sea method ( particularly nearly 900 and 1200 respectively ). In 2006, despite a sharp decrease, landfill method still the most popular way was used. While landfill method had a rapid decline, burning method and dumping in sea method became more popular to people. Particularly, both of them increased nearly 300 million ton of waste.
In 2008, the first rank of landfill method was replaced by dumping in the sea method after a rocket raise to reach the peak of over 1600. In among three years, the less popular way was used by people was burning method.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: rahipatel3011
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...006 and 2008. The units are measured in million ton. As we can see in 2005 and 2006 the...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...was dominated by dumping in sea method. While burning method always the least popular...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure of landfill method was double amount approximately 2000 million ton of burni...
^^
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e amount approximately 2000 million ton of burning and dumping in sea method pa...
^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on of burning and dumping in sea method particularly nearly 900 and 1200 respect...
^^
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...cularly nearly 900 and 1200 respectively . In 2006, despite a sharp decrease, land...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75418994413 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3406960556 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530726256983 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8349136488 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0640418336531 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300277910945 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048742821153 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0549842976225 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499059648821 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.77 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.