The provided chart gives information about prolonged global migration in Britain over the period from 1999 to 2008.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the number of people immigrating and emigrating in the Uk over the given years. Additionally, the figure for net migration showed no significant changes despite some peaks in 2004 and 2007.
Turning to the detail, in 1999, about 450,000 people came to reside in Britain compared to just over 300,000 emigrants registered concurrently. In the next 7 years, the number of people emigrating in the Uk went up considerably to 400,000 people, prior to a decrease to 350,000 people in 2007, and then it experienced a small rebound to approximately 420,000 people in 2008.
Regarding the quantity of immigrants in Britain, the figure underwent a dramatic growth to nearly 600,000 people at the end of the period. Meanwhile, in 1999,the figure for net migration stood at around 160,000 people, and it remained stable until 2003. From 2004 onwards,the net migration rate fluctuated between 250,000 people and 160,000 people by the end of the period.
- The following chart show the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to housing preferences of UK people 84
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some think that governments should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ned stable until 2003. From 2004 onwards,the net migration rate fluctuated between 2...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19553072626 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80161888578 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581005586592 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4029995455 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0880745103342 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476603484737 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387949217393 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716987094912 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399618554064 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.