The graph below shows the number of applicants from four different countries in a UK university between 1999 and 2003.
The given bar chart illustrates the figures for the number of people in four nations applying to the UK university in a four-year period, from 1999 to 2003.
Overall, it can be seen that in the initial period, the number of applicants from the European Nations was the highest. In contrast, in the end of this year period, the number of Far East applicants was dominant. Additionally, Africa remained the lowest number over four years.
It is clear that, in 1999, the number of European Nations applicants made for 30,000, followed by the Far East and Middle East with 15,000 and 10,000, respectively. In the next four years, the number of applicants from Far East and Middle East doubled, which counted for 30,000 and 20,000, respectively.
The number of applicants from Africa slightly went up during the year period and reached its peak at almost 6,000 in the year 2003. The number of applicants from Middle East witnessed a wave-like movement, however, it still increased 10,000 more people in 2003 compared to the year 1999.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-18 | qnhisonthwaytoul | 74 | view |
- The table shows the number pf employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 84
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 86
- The table below gives information the satisfaction rate in a course of first year students 73
- The graphs below show the percentage of math graduate and all graduates who got full time job after graduating from a university in Australia and also show the average salary of both these types of grads from 2004 to 2012 67
- The graph below shows the number of enquires received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90285714286 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57235538853 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3803084451 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27480756587 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144459470441 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691827266803 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198591110608 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715157386873 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.