The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The line chart compares the number of questions sent by various types of media namely in person, letter or email, telephone in a country from January to June in the year 2011.
The most striking feature is that the number of inquiries sent by an individual recorded a significant change. In addition, receiving in person and telephone saw an upward trend in the number of questions, the one in letter or email dropped during the time surveyed.
In the first month of 2011. The number of inquiries sent by cell phone was highest, at over 800 questions. Furthermore, more questions sent by letter or email than by individual with under 800 questions and more than 400 questions respectively.
The period between January and June witnessed a dramatic growth in the numbers of inquiries in person and telephone and reached its peaks at above 1200 questions and 1000 questions respectively. In contrast, the figure for letter and email felt gradually to under 600 questions in April and it then continuously dropped to its bottom at nearly 400 inquiries in June.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lunanguyen0701 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 73
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 89
- The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 67
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days. 78
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, then, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93854748603 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72888873798 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525139664804 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6579469311 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145747983216 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839246475548 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537486778455 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912315740893 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262757754921 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.