The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying IT from 1985-2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying it at university from 1985-2015.
The graph shows information about it at university in 1985 female students studying very less than man students. woman pupils were only around 1000 and male students were more than female pupils.they were around 5000. After that in 1990 they both only increased. In 1997 year they equaled. Then female pupils grew than man students. In 2006 they both were around 27000.
so in 2010 woman students was increased and they were 33000. but man pupils was around 34000. Sure male students were so much more than woman pupils. In 2015 man pupils were around 40000 and female students were 27000. In 2015 female didn't grow
In conclusion female pupils didn't grow and feom 1985 to 2010 male and woman students grew. but the graph shows that from 2010 female students decreased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | Nozima Ostonova | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying IT at university from 1985-2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The graph below shows the number of male and female of male and female students studying IT at university from 1985-2015 56
- The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying IT from 1985-2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying IT at university from 1985-2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Woman
...s studying very less than man students. woman pupils were only around 1000 and male s...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...an female pupils.they were around 5000. After that in 1990 they both only increased. ...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... both were around 27000. so in 2010 woman students was increased an...
^^
Line 19, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ents was increased and they were 33000. but man pupils was around 34000. Sure male ...
^^^
Line 19, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ale students were 27000. In 2015 female didnt grow In conclusion female pupils d...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts were 27000. In 2015 female didnt grow In conclusion female pupils didnt grow ...
^^^^^
Line 21, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e 27000. In 2015 female didnt grow In conclusion female pupils didnt grow and...
^^
Line 21, column 30, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t grow In conclusion female pupils didnt grow and feom 1985 to 2010 male and wom...
^^^^^
Line 21, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...5 to 2010 male and woman students grew. but the graph shows that from 2010 female s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04697986577 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10376725757 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 66.0 106.607317073 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442953020134 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3553785388 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 57.8461538462 112.824112599 51% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.4615384615 22.9334400587 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.15384615385 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265549678739 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118365379838 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144717218946 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254336913403 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158127858807 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.69 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.83 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.77 8.06136585366 72% => OK
difficult_words: 15.0 40.7170731707 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 11.4329268293 35% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 4.0 11.0658536585 36% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.