The given line chart illustrates how many foreign tourists to three distinct zones in a nation in Europe from 1987 to 2007.
It is clear that there was an upward trend in the number of alien visitors traveling to the coast and the mountains in a European country over 20 years. However, the number of foreigners visiting the lakes was reported to increase significantly in 15 early years of the period and then suddenly dropped at the end of it.
In 1987, the coast in a European nation was visited by 40 thousand overseas tourists, in comparison with only 10 and 20 thousand foreigners traveling to the lakes and the mountains respectively. Over the next five years, there was a fall to 35 thousand visitors from other countries to the coast while the number of people touring abroad to the lakes and mountainous regions in this European country went up to 25 thousand. From 1992 to 1997, three different areas saw the same upward trend in which coastal regions considerably surged to 50 and the lakes had a substantial increase by 40 whereas the mountains attracted 30 thousand foreign travelers.
Between 1997 and 2002, the mountainous areas and the coast had a stable increase in the number of overseas visitors while that statistics of the lakes soared dramatically and reached a peak at 75 thousand in 2002. However, in the later years, the number of people traveling abroad to the lakes in this European nation had fallen steeply to 50 thousand while the others continued to grow till the end of this period.
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 89
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a frog Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 84
- The graph below shows changes in the share of vehicle registrations of the three most common types of commercial vehicles in the US between 1970 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a frog Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ree distinct zones in a nation in Europe from 1987 to 2007. It is clear that t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, whereas, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80608365019 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63273871862 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475285171103 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.9705233018 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.0 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.875 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225252210224 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103283843736 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428306867808 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13576001973 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204334389772 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.