The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line chart gives information about the total number of people visiting a Caribbean island over a 7-year period, as well as the number of two different types of visitors.

Overall, the total number and both types of visitors experienced an upward trend over time, while the figure for visitors who stayed on cruise ships surpassed those staying on the island in 2016, becoming the biggest group of visitors.

As the graph shows, the total number of visitors started at 1 million in 2010 and continued to grow between 2010 and 2017. The figure reached a peak of 3.5 million in 2017. Similarly, starting at approximately 0.25 million in 2010, the figure for visitors who stayed on cruise ships rose to 0.5 million in 2011, followed by a slight decrease to 0.25 million in 2012. Afterward, it witnessed a steady increase to 2 million in 2017.

By contrast, the number of visitors staying on the island stood at 0.75 million in 2010 and remained constant in 2011. Then, it rose rapidly to 1.5 million in 2013 but leveled off between 2014 and 2015. More visitors preferred staying on the island than on cruise ships before the decrease to 1.25 million in 2016. The figure subsequently rose to 1.5 million in 2017.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (148 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, then, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78672985782 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45683290882 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492890995261 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7786751275 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146054435649 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733003468695 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057425235269 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100175643507 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438532214415 0.0819641961636 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.