The given graph compares the data about the count of men and women, who graduated from Canadian University during 1992 and 2007. An interesting point to be noted that the females number outstripped the males count.
Overall analysis, there was a significant rise in the number of graduates including men and women. In addition, these numbers fluctuated over this given time frame.
In 1992, the count of male graduates was close to 70000, which was lowest in this category, while the female graduates number was slightly less than 100000. Additionally, with regards to female count, it increased steadily to around 105000 in 1996 and dropped slightly to 100000 in 1998 before escalating dramatically to nearly 150000, which was the highest, in 2006.
Stating further, the female count dominated male count between 1992 and 2006, however there was a sharp rise in the male graduates count, from 70000 to more than 90000. In 1995, the male count rose to approximately 76000 but after that declined to about 73000 in 2001. Since then this count climed sharply and peaked at close to 95000 in 2006.
- The table below shows sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 73
- The charts below give information about world's spending, world's population and consumption of resources.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 69
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03278688525 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44927030361 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0120757097 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119624512317 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573258935826 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612286096259 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089287126625 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518557157421 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.