The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
The given line chart compares the number of students further classified as males and females who graduated from a Canadian university over a period of 15 years from 1992 to 2007.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that more females than males were graduated throughout the given time period. Moreover, the number of graduates kept on rising significantly among both the genders over time.
According to the given illustration, in 1992, exactly 70,000 boys certified as graduates as compared to the girls, who were higher in number by 30,000. From there, both males and females observed an upward trend until 1995, as the latter climbed to 105,000, up by nearly 35,000 then the former. After that, whilst the girls experienced a plunge between 1995 and 1999, as their number slipped back to 1 million, facing a few fluctuations, boys also reached close to the initial value.
Thereafter, 2000 onwards, although each gender witnessed a dramatic increase to a peak value of 150,000 and 93,000 respectively, girls maintained the highest position with a wider difference.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 92 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | thucuc | 55 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | eyraen | view | |
| 2022-01-26 | anhphan2511 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The charts below show the distribution of the world s water and the use of water in three countries 78
- The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 in the UK 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 89
- 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: higher
...ates as compared to the girls, who were higher in number by 30,000. From there, both males and f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26553672316 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72905334011 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683615819209 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3251545267 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.142857143 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208071334878 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979767340838 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925851218496 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133806918291 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108659923881 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.