The graph below shows the percentage change in the number of international students graduating from universities in different Canadians provinces between 2001 and 2006.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the percentage change in the number of international students graduating from universities in different Canadians provinces between 2001 and 2006.

The given bar chart compares the changing proportion of oversea students graduated from universities in eight provinces in Canada from 2001 to 2006
Overall, The percentage of international graduates in new brunswick were highest of all in both two years.In addition,Almost all provinces had the proportion students who are compelting their university education in 2006 higher than that in 2001, except Alberta
Looking at the details, new brunswick occupied the leading position with 7% in 2001, then this number increased gradually too nearly 12% in 2006.Besides,Nova Scotia stood a next position with 6,5% in 2201 and 11% in 2006,followed by Quebec.Meanwhile Bristish Columbia saw an upward trend during 5 years from 5% to over 10%, Alberta was only province witnessed a downward trend in the same period from nearly 6% to 4,5 %.
Turning to the remainders,Ontario saw a towfold from 3% in 2001 to 6% in 2006.Finally,Manitoba and Newfoundland had the same percentage in term of international university graduates with around 3,5% in 2001 and 6,5 % in 2006.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-20 NgocDo 78 view
2014-09-29 eddysuaib 60 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...k were highest of all in both two years.In addition,Almost all provinces had the p...
^^
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Almost
...est of all in both two years.In addition,Almost all provinces had the proportion studen...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...l provinces had the proportion students who are compelting their university education i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Besides
...reased gradually too nearly 12% in 2006.Besides,Nova Scotia stood a next position with ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Nova
...gradually too nearly 12% in 2006.Besides,Nova Scotia stood a next position with 6,5% ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...2201 and 11% in 2006,followed by Quebec.Meanwhile Bristish Columbia saw an upward trend d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...2201 and 11% in 2006,followed by Quebec.Meanwhile Bristish Columbia saw an upward trend d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 26, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Ontario
... 6% to 4,5 %. Turning to the remainders,Ontario saw a towfold from 3% in 2001 to 6% in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Finally
...a towfold from 3% in 2001 to 6% in 2006.Finally,Manitoba and Newfoundland had the same ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Manitoba
...ld from 3% in 2001 to 6% in 2006.Finally,Manitoba and Newfoundland had the same percentag...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, look, then, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31547619048 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53715327448 2.65546596893 133% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 8.94146341463 22% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 84.0 22.4926829268 373% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 303.5 43.030603864 705% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 446.5 112.824112599 396% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 84.0 22.9334400587 366% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 24.0 5.23603664747 458% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362793008587 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.296893573252 0.103423049105 287% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0171151306263 0.0843802449381 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23740707457 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830612298471 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 45.6 13.2329268293 345% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -5.32 61.2550243902 -9% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 34.9 10.3012195122 339% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.76 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.94 8.06136585366 148% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 11.4329268293 507% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 35.6 10.9970731707 324% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 11.0658536585 524% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.