The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the percentage of part-time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The change in part-time employers in four different countries of the UK from 1980 to 2010 is displayed by the bar chart, shown in percentage.
Overall, the highest rate of workers was on the Wales. Meanwhile, most of the figure in all nations experienced an increase, but the exception was those in Northern Ireland.
Initially, there had been approximately 30% of people working part-time in Wales, followed by those in the England at around a quarter. In addition, the proportion of part-timers in the Northern Ireland had been lower than that of the rest nation, about 10% and 15%, respectively.
Eventually, the percentage of the Wales part-time employers inclined slightly to about a third, and that of those in the England also witness an upward trend to exceed 30%. Furthermore, ones in the Scotland went up significantly, with more or less twofold. This contrasted to other countries, they in the Northern Ireland decreased to tenth, being the lowest figure.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-23 hellocacban view
2022-08-05 kaushalpatel569 55 view
2022-06-01 Elena Phan 73 view
2022-02-14 Vuthungan 78 view
2021-11-14 phuongquynh79 47 view
Essays by user naufalrahman96 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ased to tenth, being the lowest figure.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, third, while, in addition, more or less

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11320754717 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9453844814 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647798742138 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9892840738 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.625 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112504961191 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447944929778 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487765486241 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704534607293 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485399750398 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.