The line graph displays the number of people of various ages that engaged in music concerts between 2010 and 2015.
Overall, the youngest outstripped all with the highest concert attendance levels, whereas the oldest became the lowest in involvement. Apart from the 55-64 aged group, the attendance rate of the citizens, residing in this community at music shows, was on the rise.
In 2010, people from age 45 to 54 had the highest participation at 50%, while the percentages of the 25-44 group, as well as the 16-24 group, were somewhat lower, at 40%. The under-25 group, though, defeated the older groups by just one year and rose dramatically in 2015 to 71%. Conversely, the percentages rate of participation of the other two groups struggled for a while, with the lowest 40% in 2011 for the 45-54 aged group and 30% in 2012 for the 25-44 age group.
Despite the low overall rates of elderly groups, their rates both increased in 2011. Although citizens between the ages of 55 and 64 held a 20% and 30% participation average, the eldest showed little engagement in music concerts, resulting in the lowest 10% in 2013, until 2015 as the percentage rate generally bounced back to just over 20%.
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 63
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, so, well, whereas, while, apart from, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82038834951 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5845172615 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6246973357 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.125 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340378131891 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14513998904 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993121037314 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212524514371 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983962381134 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, so, well, whereas, while, apart from, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82038834951 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5845172615 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6246973357 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.125 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340378131891 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14513998904 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993121037314 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212524514371 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983962381134 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.