The line graph illustrates the proportion of citizens in different age groups in one city, attending music concert from 2010 to 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that the people aged 16-24, 45-54, and 75+ increased, except for 25-44, and 55-64. In addition, the percentage of the oldest was the lowest during the period shown.
Turning to the chart for the details, the 16-24 group made up 40% of the total number of people attending music concert, which was the same as those 45-54. Throughout the following 5 years, the proportion of the youngest reached a peak of 70%, while that of for people falling into the 45-54 age group rose minimally to 49% despite a sudden dip to 30% in 2012. Notably, the people aged 75+ was recorded a slight increase despite some fluctuations, climbing from the smallest figure of 10% in 2010 to just over 20% in the last year.
Looking at the remaining age groups, the majority of people aged 25-44 joined in music concert, accounting for 52%, which was double those aged 55-64 (26%). Over the next 1 year, the figure for the 25-44 age bracket decreased slightly to 40% before recovering in the final year. In addtion, that of 55-to-64-year-old people was experienced a minimal drop (23%) despite growing slightly in 2011.
- The chart below shows the spending in million dollars per household in the US on five different products in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from 5 organizations Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 73
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77880184332 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53414324145 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1729413395 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2692459012 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120236488605 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1208214695 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201236040034 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140735947665 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.