The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the trend in the proportion of people watching movies in a European country from Mondays to Fridays. The study covers a period from 2003 to 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that the trend of people going to cinemas are the same within the five-year time frame. It is also clear that there were most viewers during Fridays and weekends than there were during Mondays to Thursdays.
In 2003, there was a steady increase of the rate of movie goers from Monday to Tuesday at 10 % to 20 %. The percentage slightly dipped before it reached a high of 40 %. This figure usually went down to 30 % over Sundays which was three folds higher than its initial figure during Mondays.
Concurrently, the same trend happened in 2005 and 2007 where the highest percentage of cinema admission was during Saturdays at 45 % and about 42 %, respectively. However, the least number of visits were observed every Wednesday and Thursday in 2005 with about 14 % while less than 10 % during Wednesdays in 2007. Meanwhile, a similar rate of 30 % was observed every Fridays for the whole study period.
- The first graph gives the number of passengers travelling by train in Sydney The second graph provides information on the percentage of trains running on time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 82
- The bar charts below provide information about percentages of students who are proficient in a foreign language in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experien 73
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people.Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tudy covers a period from 2003 to 2007. Overall, it can be seen that the trend o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84042553191 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44408732114 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627659574468 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0912012109 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.085757555298 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353945157689 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482424548411 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0559053114208 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318820443012 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.