The graph provides information about changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK. There was just one direction from the graph – upward. There were four modern technologies in the graph: CD player, Mobile phone, Home computer and Internet access. The graph was experimented from the 1996 to 2003 year. The CD player, Home computer and Internet access graphs increased gradually. For example, the percentage of CD player graph started from 60 and ended with about 83. By contrast, the trend of Mobile phone rose wildly. It began from 20% and finished with 70%. It means that there was a big change of Mobile phone trend. In conclusion, people become move adapted for modern technologies.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Thu Ngo
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- It Is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 56
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 76
- The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The graph below shows the average monthly use of health club in Miami and Florida by all full-time members over last year. The pie charts show the age profile of male and female members. 84
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 601.0 965.302439024 62% => OK
No of words: 120.0 196.424390244 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00833333333 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30975091965 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53803018544 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 174.6 283.868780488 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.767414668 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 60.1 112.824112599 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.0 22.9334400587 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22498893516 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092631097467 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113103182163 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22498893516 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.89 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.