The graph below shows the percentage of urban/suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 1999 and 2004.

The following bar graph gives information about inhabitants who live in city and in the country having the Internet connection during a five year period, in a specific country.

As can be seen clearly, people of rural area had the least usage of Internet in 2011 with 1%.
However, over the years their interest in the Internet increased gradually, and it recorded percentage almost 30 times as big as the starting point, in 2016 (32%).

Similarly, household of urban area suffered on the Internet with an upward tendency. It started with 11% in 2011, following by a sharp increase to 50% in 2014. Thereafter it had steady rise to 53% in 2016, while it made up the big share of total usage in all years in comparison to the other group.

To sum up, urban and outskirts dwellers recorded much more figure of using Internet than that of villagers.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 161, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thereafter,
...ing by a sharp increase to 50% in 2014. Thereafter it had steady rise to 53% in 2016, whil...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, so, well, while, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 707.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74496644295 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.552048171 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.664429530201 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7306800528 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173653151438 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737285180139 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440958356863 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875349214051 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181876887438 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.