The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon. The counties are Columbia, Yamhill, Washington
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph provides information from the research into the population of three distinguish county in the state of Oregon over a sixty-year period between 1940 and 2000.
Overall, according to the data, Washington prevailed in the number of citizens while the other counterparts followed a similar pattern.
To be specific, in 1940, Washington’s population was approximately 75 thousand people. This figure gradually increased to more than 120 thousand people after 30 year. after witnessing a dramatic upsurge, there were nearly 255 thousand residents lived in the county in the end of twentieth century.
Turning to the remaining counterparts, both Yamhill’s population and Columbia’s population experienced insignificant rises. The former rose by about 15 thousand citizens while the latter rose for just more than 7 thousand of people. In the second half of the period, both of these categories had their figures doubled. Despite of having these fluctuations, two counties had a roughly difference in their population.
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- Many young people today are leaving their homes in the countryside to move to cities Why is this happening What can be done to encourage young people to stay in rural areas 84
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon. Columbia, Yamhill, WashingtonSummarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 11
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U S from 1960 to 2011 Unit is measured in million tons and the percent recycling on total trash produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 89
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies How does competitiveness a ect individuals Is it a positive or negative trend 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 21, column 173, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...than 120 thousand people after 30 year. after witnessing a dramatic upsurge, there we...
^^^^^
Line 25, column 385, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('roughly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('difference') instead of another adjective.
...ng these fluctuations, two counties had a roughly difference in their population.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89240506329 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26049511469 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670886075949 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.444444444 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185190708683 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680878512061 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944339285553 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114874667491 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118901399141 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.4140731707 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.