The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012.
The line graph shows data about the population of four different types of turtles in India between the years 1980 and 2012.
In general, it can be seen that there was a downward trend in the number of Leatherback Turtles, while that of Olive Ridley saw an opposite trend for the whole period. The proportion of both Green Turtles and all species of turtles fluctuated steadly from 1980 to 2012.
According to the line graph, the figures for the Leatherback Turtles start at about 100 and was relatively stable over the last two decades, although there was a marginal soar from 1983 to 1987. After that, there was a significant decrease, this figure reached the lowest point at around 40 in 2012 , making it the lowest for the given period. On the other hand, Olive Ridlye Turtles saw an opposite pattern to that of Leatherback Turtles, in fact the number of Olive Ridley Turtles increased gradually from to 1980 to 1996, then oscillated moderately until 2012, terminating at around 125. The data for both Green Turtles and all species of turtles remained approximately the same until 1986, by the following years there was a slight palpitation for both of them from 1987 to 2012 , whereas the number of all species exceeded that of the Green Turtles by about 20.
- According to a recent study, the more time people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world- wide, we should be conce 73
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 61
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012. 73
- The diagram shows proposed changes to Foster Road Write a 150 word report describing the proposed changes for a local committee 48
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban/suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 2008 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...back Turtles, while that of Olive Ridley saw an opposite trend for the whole peri...
^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ed the lowest point at around 40 in 2012 , making it the lowest for the given peri...
^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncreased gradually from to 1980 to 1996, then oscillated moderately until 2012, t...
^^
Line 5, column 784, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ation for both of them from 1987 to 2012 , whereas the number of all species excee...
^^
Line 5, column 868, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d that of the Green Turtles by about 20.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, while, in fact, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81278538813 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45985769075 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51598173516 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.598657703 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.571428571 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295238013828 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16476515559 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1852299083 0.0843802449381 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289373231737 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.220975108886 0.0819641961636 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.