The line graph provides information about the population statistics of four different types of turtles (Leatherback, Green, Olive Ridley, and all species) in India from 1980 to 2012.
Overall, the total number of all species of turtles remained relatively constant over the past three decades, whereas Green and Leatherback turtles saw a decrease in numbers, with the latter experiencing the greatest decline. In contrast, the population of Olive Ridley turtles increased steadily but substantially over the given period.
In 1980, all species of turtles numbered 100. This figure encountered some changes over time but remained comparatively stable at more or less its initial value. The statistics for Olive Ridley turtles began to climb gradually and peaked at around 140 in 1997. Their numbers remained somewhat steady over the years and settled at about 130 by 2012, the highest figure in this time period.
On the other hand, Green turtle numbers saw several fluctuations before dropping slightly to a little more than 90. Leatherback turtles faced the most dramatic decline, hitting a low-point of about 60 by the beginning of 2012, almost half of their initial value.
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 100
- The responsibility of bringing up children should be shared equally between mother and father To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. 95
- Advantages and disadvantages of mobile phones in our daily lives 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, in contrast, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36021505376 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66270191737 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1235549727 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.777777778 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166081254753 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750386496766 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712659911753 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119724930328 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856199025244 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.