The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This line graph provides information about the growth of society in two countries. These two countries are China and India and it counts for 50 years from 2000 to 2050.
In 2000, there were more people living in China than in India. According to the data, India’s only had 1.000 billion and China’s had 1.200 billion citizens. A few years later, there were additional amounts for both countries. It resulted in 1.100 billion for India’s population and over 1.300 for China’s population.
On the other hand, expert predicts that the amount for Chinese and Indian will be the same in 2030. In addition, after 2030, the growth for India’s residents is going to rise until it reaches a peak in 2050. However, China’s society growth is reduced slightly and produces 1.400 billion in 2050.
In summary, when 2000 China is more populated than India, but after 50 years, scientist forecasts India’s population will be higher than China’s population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | cindycornelia98 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | ngothithunguyet | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Nehaa Sharma | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | lordwind | 84 | view |
- In general, people do not have such a close relationship with their neighbours as they did in the past.Why is this so, and what can be done to improve contact between neighbours? 67
- The cgar below shows the total number of minutes in billions of teephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 61
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A,B and C over four different seasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The amount of sport shown on television every week has increased significantly and this is having a impact on live sport events Do you think the benefits of having more televised sport are greater than the disadvantages 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, in addition, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32911392405 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80474024782 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3768150083 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267837374177 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115640807394 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499827511467 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175654514811 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195963687601 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.