The graph below shows the proportion aged 65 and over between 1930 and 1980 in three different countries.
The per centum of the populace aged 65 and above from 1930 to 1980 is depicted in the line graph of three countries London,Spain and Portugal.
It is clear that in 1930, Portugal had the highest percentage of people aged 65 and above. The figure continued to rise till 1950 and reached up to 15 percent. However, the trend reversed between 1950 and 1970 as the percentage of the ageing population dropped by 2 percent. After 1970, it again increased to nearly 22 percent in 1980. While in Spain, it is clear that population of senior citizens rose dramatically from nearly 65 percent in 1930 to about 25 percent in 1980.
Moving further, London experienced most dramatic changes in the population of older people. The percentage of people aged 65 and over was just 5 percent in 1930. Interestingly, this figure rose dramatically and reached approximately 27 percent in the end.
It is, therefore, clear that the percentage of population aged 65 and beyond of all three nations went up by following a fluctuating trend. However, maximum increase was in London.
- International travel has become cheaper more and more countries open their doors and more tourists go abroad for travelling. Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages. 61
- The graph below shows the proportion aged 65 and over between 1930 and 1980 in three different countries 92
- International travel has become cheaper more and more countries have opened their doors and more tourist go abroad for travelling Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Spain
...the line graph of three countries London,Spain and Portugal. It is clear that in ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95580110497 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81113963163 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552486187845 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3451769593 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5454545455 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232519910173 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916570039332 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884178629468 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154383244215 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061544270944 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.