The given line graph illustrates the percentage of four different materials namely paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans and plastics between 1982 and 2010 in a specific nation.
Overall, the recycle rate of paper and cardboard increased steadily with fluctuation then after a decade it went down significantly, while in glass containers, it decreased progressively in beginning of six period then grew up moderately until 2010. In aluminium cans and plastics, there was an increase trend across the entire recorded period.
Around 65% paper and cardboard recycled in 1982. Then, the percentage of recycle fluctuated during a first decade and reached at 80% before steadily dropping to 70% in 2010. On the other hand, about 50% glass containers recycled in first year. After a four year period it went down to 40% and then dramatically inclined to 50% in 1992 before slightly soaring to 60% after 18 years.
The recycle rate of aluminium cans and plastics were being started in 1982 and 1986, respectively. In aluminium cans, just below 5% recycled in 1982, whereas in plastics, just nearly 2% recycled in the same year. Then, the proportion of aluminium cans recycled surged dramatically and reached to approximately 45% until 2010. In plastics, it increased slightly and moved to only around 10% in 2010.
- The line graph shows the number of people who moved from four European countries to the United States of America. 73
- Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects. But, others believe that teenagers should focus on the subject that they are best at or that they find the most interest. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 71
- Some people believe that a person’s intelligence is inherited from the parents, while others believe that their environment is the main factor. Discuss these views. Which factor do you think is mostly responsible for intelligence? 11
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local language. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local l 61
- summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23364485981 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83003246673 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53738317757 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.2893216716 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.818181818 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233845759935 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926375975936 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616425285736 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147006121924 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743305717241 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.