The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

The given line graph illustrates the information about the four different materials that were recycled between 28 years (1982-2010) in one county.

To begin with, paper and cardboard both were highly recycled throughout the whole given time period,its percent gone upto 80%. Whereas, very less amount of plastics were recycled between the years 1988 to 2008.

Further more, in the year 1982 only 50% of glass containers were recycled and than by fluctuations this percentage went upto 60%.Moreover, in the year 1982 about 2% of aluminum cans were recycled and then this percentage climbed to 36% in the year 2006.

In crux it is to be said that recycling of paper and cardboard was at highest point throughout the whole time period and plastics were minimumly recycled between the given years.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , its
...d throughout the whole given time period,its percent gone upto 80%. Whereas, very le...
^^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the years 1988 to 2008. Further more, in the year 1982 only 50% of glass conta...
^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...% of glass containers were recycled and than by fluctuations this percentage went up...
^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ctuations this percentage went upto 60%.Moreover, in the year 1982 about 2% of aluminum ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, then, whereas, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 670.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 131.0 196.424390244 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11450381679 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.38312328216 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56656615239 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603053435115 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 187.2 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3689811658 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247817213745 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14456843025 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100309150904 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167560322606 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101060076403 0.0819641961636 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.