The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

The line graph showcases, information about recycled substance a paper and cardboard, a glass containers, a aluminium cans and a plastic over a period 1982 to 2010 in the particular Nation.

A deepdive into the analysis of graph, we understand that, paper and cardboard were the highest recycled material over a period. In 1982, it was only 60%, it reached a pick approximately 80% in 1994. Overhead in 2010, it slightly down at nearly 70%. Moreover, in 1982, glass containers were second highest substance, nearly 50%. Thereafter, it is slightly down by 40% in 1990, and at the end, in 2010, each reached 60%. On the other hand, aluminium cans were 5% in 1986, it was the only recycled materials which had upward treat throughout the period, year after year and ultimately, it reached 45% in 2010. In constant, plastic were least recycled material over a period, with 2 percent in 1990, furthermore it rose by 8% respectively during the period of two decades.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ph showcases, information about recycled substance a paper and cardboard, a glas...
^^
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, information about recycled substance a paper and cardboard, a glass container...
^^
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'container'?
Suggestion: container
...bstance a paper and cardboard, a glass containers, a aluminium cans and a plastic over a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...aper and cardboard, a glass containers, a aluminium cans and a plastic over a pe...
^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a glass containers, a aluminium cans and a plastic over a period 1982 to 2010 in ...
^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... we understand that, paper and cardboard were the highest recycled material over ...
^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r a period. In 1982, it was only 60%, it reached a pick approximately 80% in 1994...
^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oximately 80% in 1994. Overhead in 2010, it slightly down at nearly 70%. Moreover...
^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'treated'.
Suggestion: treated
...nly recycled materials which had upward treat throughout the period, year after year ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, second, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87804878049 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79643480001 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7197979501 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236317549223 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998126533168 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482538952251 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191565663776 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135385407889 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.