the graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in the three different countries.
The line graph compares three different countries Japan, Sweden and The USA in terms of the percentages of people with 65 and over years old over a period of a century, between 1940 and 2040.
It is clear that the number of elderly people has been slightly increasing over period shown. Japan had the lowest proportion of population aged 65 and over among these three countries until now, however it is estimated that this country will have the highest percentage of this category of people after 2030 compared with two other countries.
In 1940, Japan had the lowest percentage of the elderly with just 5% of its population. These figures for Sweden and the USA were 7% and 9% respectively. Japan saw a slight decrease of 2% and reached a low of 3% in 1960 and then this figure maintain the same level for a period of 15 years. The number of the Japanese elderly have started to increase since 1990 and it has been continuing its upward trend until now. It is expected that this country will see a dramatic rise in 2030 which will place it over two other countries in terms of the percentage of elderly people.
On the other hand, Sweden and the USA had been having the same trend and both of them went up slightly from 1940 to 1980 and reached almost 15% .While Sweden then had a sharp increase which reached it to 20% in 2018 and therefore it overtook the USA in 1998, the USA keep its level for 40 years, until 2020. It is anticipated that the USA will see a considerable rise over next 40 years. The figures which are estimated to will be registered by Japan, Sweden and the USA in 2040 are 27%, 25% and 23% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | lunanguyen0701 | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-18 | adel1363 | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-28 | Nguyễn Thanh Bình | 67 | view |
| 2016-11-05 | Jamalin | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...from 1940 to 1980 and reached almost 15% .While Sweden then had a sharp increase w...
^^
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...om 1940 to 1980 and reached almost 15% .While Sweden then had a sharp increase which ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, therefore, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 299.0 196.424390244 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46488294314 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37274411899 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464882943144 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.9675087387 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.363636364 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174167268778 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066855180036 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960925314315 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145657631033 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120288256795 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.