The graph below shows the quantities of goods transport in the UK between 1974 to 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The chart reveals changes in the amount of good delivered by four different means of transport namely road, water, rail and pipeline in the UK from 1974 to 2002. Overall, all categories witnessed an upward trend, among which road was used the most for goods during the time surveyed.
The figure for road always possessed the highest rate, rising from about 70 in the first year to a peak of just under 100 million tonnes in the last year. By contrast, that for the pipeline was used the least among all, which its value experienced a twofold increase from roughly 2 in 1974 to the highest point at 20 million tonnes after 28-year-period. Regarding the two remaining categories, although being a more popular way to deliver goods in the first year, the figure for rail stood at its initial point at 40 million tonnes in 2002 after witnessing a marginal fluctuation. Meanwhile, the water showed a different pattern with its figure reaching a peak at approximately 65 million tonnes in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-03 | Geegeepay | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-14 | abishek_dhakal | 67 | view |
- The table compares the percentage of mobile phone owners using their phone features from 2006 to 2010 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- The pie charts show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... to the highest point at 20 measured in million tonnes after 28-year-period. Regarding ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79428571429 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58441166873 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.4606581096 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.833333333 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1360823043 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793859612619 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104551939239 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139592491465 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885201546489 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.