The given line graph demonstrates the quantities of goods which have been transported in the UK via four modes of transport between 1974 and 2002.
Starting with Road and water, the goods transported by road exhibited some minor oscillations, and thereafter, reached about 100 million tons in the year 2002, but when it comes to water, the goods were stood at 40 million tons in the stating year 1974 and 1978. After that, displayed a rapid rise of almost 17 million tons between 1982 and 1994 as well as finally reached over 60 million tons in 2002.
Moving further, goods transported by train started with 40 million tons; afterward, decreased significantly, and started fluctuating; eventually, the products reached 40 million tons again in the year 2002. Finally, goods conveyed by pipeline rose considerably until 1982; subsequently, from 1982 to 2002, there was a stagnation just with the minor differences.
Overall, goods in the UK, which were distributed through several modes of transportation, almost followed a rising trend in all the modes except the rail transport.
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced. 67
- Many sports players advertise sport-related products. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 61
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred. 78
- The diagram below shows the production of electricity using a system called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC). 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e considerably until 1982; subsequently, from 1982 to 2002, there was a stagnatio...
^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll the modes except the rail transport.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87137029081 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594285714286 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.025832034 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.666666667 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334918799325 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189028055353 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180591297854 0.0843802449381 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256618187393 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188002257034 0.0819641961636 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.