The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives information about the quantities number of goods moved by 4 types of transportation in UK from 1974 to 2002. At the first glance, it can be seen that road, water and rail transportation fluctuated while pipeline increased. Overall, all transportation had an upward trend.
To begin with, the quantities of road increased slightly to around 75 from 1974 to 1978 and was followed by a slight decline before continued increasing gradually until 1990 at roughly 82. It decreased marginally by approximately 3 in 1994 and had a significant rise to 98 onward. However, the number of goods quantities transported by water increased slightly to 40 from 1974 to 1978 which was the same point with rail transportation. In 1982, water transportation rose gradually by 10 while rail dropped by 3 and continued falling until 1983. Moreover, water mode experienced a slight climb before fell to 52 in 1998 and bounced up to 65 onward. This contrast to rail mode which saw a fluctuation over the following 15 years and reached at 41 in 2002.
On the other hand, pipeline mode stood at 5 in 1974 and increased steadily by 12 over the following 5 years. From 1982 to 1995, there was a marginal increase at 22 and remained constant onward.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-13 | lalalalalalalalala | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-23 | mary.ssherr | 86 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83644859813 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99872232378 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57476635514 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8133155868 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0909090909 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174556391368 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732492573503 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801906220587 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131775870885 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872000391429 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.