The chart illustrates the proportion of delivered products in 4 distintive modes of transport from 1974 to 2002 in England.
In general, they all had fluctuated predisposition with road transport took advantage during the period of time shown. Meanwhile, sealines tend to be less common at first yet started to beat railways and came to the second place then.
It can be seen clearly that in 1944, the number of goods transported by road was 72 million tonnes while the rest three modes including water, rail and pipeline were respectively exact 40, nearly 40 and merely 5 million tonnes. By 1978, the figure of water was similar to rail (40 million tonnes), which means railways had not changed its volume of goods since the first year and sea transport had a slight movement of data. In the last period, the rates were completely different between the four in which the road possessed a drastical tonnes with almost 100 million, followed by sealines (over 60 million), railways (roughly 40 million) and pipeline staying still at the bottom of the graph (just 21 million).
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar canes Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activities in 2010 78
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 89
- More and more fathers are taking a break from their careers so that they can stay home and take care of their children while their wives work This is better for the family than having both parents work full time To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...oad transport took advantage during the period of time shown. Meanwhile, sealines tend to be l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, still, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86813186813 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55671095773 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653846153846 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0387887644 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.666666667 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136531055651 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708878710849 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408252768527 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101227481495 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419621275357 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.