The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.

The line graph provides information about the different mode of goods transportation and the quantity of products transported in the UK, from 1974 to 2002.
The majority of goods were transported using the road, while the pipeline was the least used mode of transport.

According to the graph, about 70 million tonnes of various goods were transported using the road transportation system in 1974. In the same year, the second largest amount of goods, about 40 million tonnes, were transported using the rail lines and the water mode. Only 5 million tonnes were transported with the pipeline way at beginning of period.

Over the years, the amount of goods transported increased with some fluctuation. The use of water transportation system was increase significantly between 1978 and 1982, while the road mode, which in 2002 was used for about 100 million tonnes of goods, remained the most used for products transportation. The water lines contributed with an average of 60 million tonnes of goods transported during all period, with a gradually increase in 2002. The rail ways, after a steadily decline between 1978 and just before 1986, had a fluctuating trend, but the quantity of goods transported by this mode remained almost same at 1974. Finally, the use of pipeline ways increased to over million in 2002, compare about 5 million in 1974.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-21 PsycRicky 56 view
2020-01-16 Raksadil 73 view
2020-01-16 Adilrahi 73 view
2019-12-27 happyhappy 61 view
2019-11-28 bibikulsum 84 view
Essays by user SilviaD :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he pipeline way at beginning of period. Over the years, the amount of goods tran...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 416, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...ods transported during all period, with a gradually increase in 2002. The rail ways, after a steadil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 446, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...iod, with a gradually increase in 2002. The rail ways, after a steadily decline bet...
^^^
Line 6, column 467, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
... increase in 2002. The rail ways, after a steadily decline between 1978 and just before 1986, had ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 729, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2002, compare about 5 million in 1974.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11711711712 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80693889014 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472972972973 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9385264405 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27258892177 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144444242061 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973563956688 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232485293922 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960438031549 0.0819641961636 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.