The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph demonstrates the proportion of people using radio and television throughout the day form October to December in United Kingdom in the year of 1992. Overall, It is illustrate that most of British watched television in the afternoon in 1992 while majority of people listened radio in the morning.
Looking at the graph in more detailed, the percentage of radio audience witnessed a sharp increase by approximately 20% from 6.00 a.m to 8.30 a.m and reached a peak of nearly 27%. After that, there was a gradual drop from 27% to about 1% between 8h30 a.m and 2 a.m in the number of British listening radio in 1992 before keeping stable in next 4 hours. In contrast, the ratio of television audience fluctuated between 6.00 a.m and 2 p.m before soaring up by nearly 30% and peaked at 45% in 8 p.m. Between 8 p.m and 2 p.m, the total people using television plunged and bottomed out of 1% at nearly 2.30 a.m. After that, there was a slight rise from 1% at 2.30 a.m to nearly 3% at 6 a.m in the ratio of British watching television in 1992.
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 76
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Most medical doctors want to work in cities where they will make a lot of money Yet in many rural areas there are not enough doctors What are the reasons for this problem How can it be solved 73
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'illustrated'.
Suggestion: illustrated
...dom in the year of 1992. Overall, It is illustrate that most of British watched television...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46875 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5674917505 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520833333333 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.3981900267 43.030603864 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.6 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.4 22.9334400587 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165648691831 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10330619949 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519594128023 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151027930008 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513832799484 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.29 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.24 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.