The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000.
The line graph illustrates how many men and women smoked in Someland between 1960 and 2000.
Overall, there was an increase in the rate of women smoking in these years, while the figure for men saw a gradual decrease. In addition, the proportion of men smoking in Someland was always higher than that of women.
About 600 men per 1000 people smoked in 1960, with a subsequent decline and a fluctuation in the range of 500 and 400 men per 1000 people from 1975 to 1985. Conversely, the figure for women started at roughly 100 women per 1000 residents, after which it experienced a rise to its peak (300 women per 1000 individuals) before hovering around this point.
The rate of men smoking per 1000 persons slightly dropped from 400 men in 1985 to approximately 390 men in 1990, ending the period at a low of just over 200 men smoking per 1000 people. The figure for women saw a similar change, which decreased marginally from 300 women in 1985 to the north of 300 women in 1990 and hit a low of precisely 200 women smoking per 1000 people at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-29 | wholemilk | view | |
| 2023-11-27 | ililmaidatuz | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | vankhanh2k60209@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | Phuong1810 | view | |
| 2023-10-10 | Phuong1810 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed line phones from 1994 to 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The line graphs of five different communication services worldwide 61
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45918367347 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37281103228 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6660459762 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.857142857 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329027133405 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17256824483 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860326813155 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216965520444 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640376462045 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.