The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below Write at least 150 words

The line graph demonstrates the rates of smoking among male and female in Someland from 1960 to 2000.
Overall, there was a downward trend in the rates of male using citagrettes while an upward trend of female smokers..
Looking at the details, form 1960 to 1980 the number of men using citagrettes had decline slightly from 600 to 450 people. Beside that the ratio of female smokers had grown considerably from 100 to nearly 300 people. In 1975, the ratio of men using citagrettes was 500 people while the figure of woman was highest with 300 people both 1975 and 1980.
furthermore, from 1985 to 2000 while the number of male smokers had falled gradually from 400 people to nearly 250 people, the figure of female decreased slightly from 300 to 200 people. Although the proportion of male smokers was higher than female, we can see the number of woman using citagrettes in Someland was very high, its was not good for your woman and its need to be reduce in the future.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph demonstrates the rates of...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... female in Someland from 1960 to 2000. Overall, there was a downward trend in t...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... while an upward trend of female smokers.. Looking at the details, form 1960...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le an upward trend of female smokers.. Looking at the details, form 1960 to 198...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st with 300 people both 1975 and 1980. furthermore, from 1985 to 2000 while the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 5, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ith 300 people both 1975 and 1980. furthermore, from 1985 to 2000 while the number of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63583815029 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33777693026 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520231213873 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3136336641 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130458277203 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770839549632 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804655068094 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108370456604 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934452428454 0.0819641961636 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.