The graph below shows the rate of women's literacy and population growth in selected countries from 1988 to 2000.
A glance at the graph provided reveals a negative correlation between the proportion of female literacy and population growth rate in various countries from 1988 to 2000.
Specifically, the top five nations with the highest percentage of women's literacy had by far lower levels of population growth. With 96% literate women, Thailand and Colombia shared their population growth rates of mere 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively. Likewise, with levels of female literacy ranging from 84% to 90%, Dominican Republic, Jamaica, and Sri Lanka had population growth rates of just under 2%.
In stark contrast, the remainder five countries suffering from low rates of literacy for women showed markedly high figures for population growth. Especially, having a negligible 9% of women knowing how to read and write, Afghanistan's population increases at the highest rate among listed countries, namely 4.5%. Similarly, all the other countries had their population rates of well above 2.9%, with staggering low women's literacy levels, at between 8% and 21%.
- The graph below shows the rate of women s literacy and population growth in selected countries from 1988 to 2000 54
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 200.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004. 67
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984. 78
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, similarly, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50310559006 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77487556768 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614906832298 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.0413662382 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.571428571 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445984828997 0.215688989381 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214334919132 0.103423049105 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901982952531 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318972730794 0.15604864568 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539367912973 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.