The graph below shows the three different kinds of emission sources (oil / coal / gas) of greenhouse gas in the UK. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart compares how many carbon emissions three fossil fuels emiited, being measured in million tons in UK from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, the chart indicates an upward trend in the number of carbon emissions from gas, whereas oil and coal exhibited a contrasting pattern. Furthermore, the number of carbon emissions from oil and coal accounted for the largest portion; however, from 2000 onwards, this position belonged to gas.
In 1990, coal had the highest number of carbon emissions, with 310 million tons. Oil and gas recorded slightly lower numbers, with 270 million tons from the former and around 230 million tons from the latter.
Over the next 10 years, oil and coal experienced a dramatic decline in gas emissions, plummeting to 260 and 250 million tons. In contrast, the number of carbon emissions from gas increased significantly, surpassing oil and coal in 2000, and then peaked at around 320 million tons at the end of the period, holding the highest position. Meanwhile, the figure for oil and coal continued to decrease significantly, ending the period with 210 and 190 million tons respectively.
- The map shows the changes to a residence hall between 2010 and the present 84
- The graph below shows the three different kinds of emission sources oil coal gas of greenhouse gas in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below give information on the location and types of dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- The bar chart below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over of three countries in 1980 and 2000 and prediction in 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09239130435 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66248330399 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6078022935 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164556488523 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873460561745 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349138361709 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108069367591 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038738733533 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.