The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four diferent sectors between 1990 and 2007
The line graph below compares four sectors in terms of the amount of acid rain emissions that they produced over 17 years in the UK.
It is clear that the total amount of acid rain emissions considerably dramatic between 1991 and 2007. The most dramatic decrease was seen in electricity, gas and water supply sector.
In 1991, around 3.3 million tonnes of acid rain emissions came from electricity, gas and water supply sector. Then followed by, other industries sector produced approximately 2.1 million tonnes of acid rain. Just over 0.7 million tonnes of acid rain came from transport and communication sector, and 0.6 million tonnes was produced by domestic sector.
From 3.3 million tonnes of acid rain, emissions of electricity, gas and water supply fell dramatically to just 0.5 million tonnes in 2007. While acid rain emissions from domestic sector and other industries decreased gradually, transport and communication sector increased to 0.9 million tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-18 | Veeeeetran | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below compares four sectors in terms of...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'industries'' or 'industry's'?
Suggestion: industries'; industry's
... supply sector. Then followed by, other industries sector produced approximately 2.1 milli...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32467532468 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69392099404 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487012987013 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.753787589 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.5 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358316179682 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188135916126 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640702874323 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238230966007 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547889989425 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.