The line graph compares four sectors in terms of the amount of acid rain emissions that they
produced over a period of 17 years in the UK.
It is clear that the total amount of acid rain emissions in the UK dramatically dropped between 1990
and 2007. The most significant decrease was seen in the electricity, gas and water supply sector.
In 1990, around 3.3 million tones of acid rain emissions came from the electricity, gas and water
sector. The transport and communication sector was responsible for about 0.7 million tones of
emissions, while the domestic sector produced around 0.6 million tones. Just over 2 million tones
of acid rain gases came from other industries.
Emissions from electricity, gas and water supply fell dramatically to only 0.5 million tones in
2007, a lost of almost 3 million tones. While acid rain gases from the domestic sector and
other industries fell gradually, the transport sector saw a small increase in emissions, reached
a peak of 1 million tones in 2005.
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tones, from fourdifferent sectors between 1990 and 2007. 67
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London. 73
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London. 56
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.* You should write at least 150 words.* You should spend about 20 minutes on this t 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04733727811 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6665061866 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497041420118 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6184560603 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 12.0 3.83414634146 313% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403356217913 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193635974472 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681789171881 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154729688025 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836008786244 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.