The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999
The line graph below illustrates how the percentage of the unemployed people in the USA and Japan from March 1993 to March 1999.
Looking at the graph, the unemployment rate in the USA reduced while the contrast was true for Japan over the whole period surveyed.
In the first year surveyed, there was a contrast pattern in the figure of people being out of work both in the USA and Japan, with the former reaching a peak of 7.0 percent and the later hit the lowest point of 2.5 percent.
In the remaining years, the people who did not have work in the USA was seen an erratic drop by 2 percent in 1996 before going up and down around 5.0 percent till 1999. Meanwhile, the proportion in Japan, which rocketed by twofold of nearly 4.5 percent in 1996 compared to 1993, subsequently, the figure kept growing dramatically at 5.0 percent in the last year.
Summary, although the number of unemployed people in America was over 2.5 higher than Japan in 1993 but both countries changed markedly during 7 years period and got at 5.0 percent in 1999.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-02 | InamAli | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | InamAli | 93 | view |
| 2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view | |
| 2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view | |
| 2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view |
- Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty. Othersthink that crime is a result of a bad person’s nature. Discuss both views and give opinion 61
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 78
- The graph below shows the proportions of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040. 67
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 56
- The pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below illustrates how the percentage of...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56914893617 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37995510113 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56914893617 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.8694388629 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.166666667 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24590937922 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146421772846 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158108652802 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169416252102 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16365322338 0.0819641961636 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.