The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999
The line graph compares the US and Japan in terms of the change of unemployment levels over a 7-year period starting from March 1993.
Overall, despite some fluctuations at varying degrees, there was a major decrease in the proportion of the American workforce whereas it was not the case for that in Japan over the survey.
In March 1993, a high 7% of American people are jobless while the unemployment rate in Japan was roughly three times lower than the former, with around 2.4%. From 1994 to 1995, the proportion of jobless Americans declined to below 5.5% after mild ups and downs. By contrast, in Japan, the number of unemployed people witnessed a continuous rise at over 3%.
The rates of joblessness in these two countries intersected between March 1998 and March 1999 when the unemployment rate in both countries was just about 4.5%. At the end of March 1999, the figure for the unemployment rate in America was slightly lower than that in Japan, 4.6% and 4.1% respectively
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-02 | InamAli | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | InamAli | 93 | view |
| 2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view | |
| 2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view | |
| 2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view |
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 79
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 78
- The line graph below shows the average daily maximum temperatures for Auckland and Christchurch two cities in New Zealand and London and Edinburgh two cities in the United Kingdom 47
- The line graph below shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat in Japan, 4.6% and 4.1% respectively
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61443394862 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597633136095 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4302481094 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422260702108 0.215688989381 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187500317592 0.103423049105 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119714441615 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238567029399 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134546294095 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.