the graph below shows us consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone
The given line graph depicts American consumers’ average yearly spending on mobile phone and residential phone services over the ten-year period between 2001 and 2010.
Overall, it is evident that the amount of money spent on cell phone saw a noticeable rise while the average expenditure on landline phones received the opposite trend which continuously decreased over the time recorded period. It is also clear to see that the spending in 2006 was similar with both types of phones.
According to the graph, in 2001, the residential phone services were spent around 700$ by the US phone users, whereas the figure for mobile phone services was just over 200$. Moreover, the yearly expenditure on cell phone services increased to 350$ from 2001 to 2006, but the residential phone services decreased to 150$ in the same period. There was the same expense for both phone services in 2006, at about $550 on average.
In the following 4 years, the average expenditure for mobile phone services had a steady rise and it reached the peak of 750$ at the end of the period while approximately 400$ were paid by American on landline service.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- The pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people and the table shows where people born in these country lives
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is encouraged Is this trend a positive or negative development 61
- Task 1 The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week in kilometers in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week in kilometers in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ten-year period between 2001 and 2010. Overall, it is evident that the amount o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was similar with both types of phones. According to the graph, in 2001, the res...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$700'.
Suggestion: $700
...ential phone services were spent around 700$ by the US phone users, whereas the figu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$200'.
Suggestion: $200
...for mobile phone services was just over 200$. Moreover, the yearly expenditure on ce...
^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$350'.
Suggestion: $350
...ure on cell phone services increased to 350$ from 2001 to 2006, but the residential...
^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ces increased to 350$ from 2001 to 2006, but the residential phone services decre...
^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$150'.
Suggestion: $150
...residential phone services decreased to 150$ in the same period. There was the same ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vices in 2006, at about 50 on average. In the following 4 years, the average ex...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$750'.
Suggestion: $750
... steady rise and it reached the peak of 750$ at the end of the period while approxim...
^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$400'.
Suggestion: $400
...e end of the period while approximately 400$ were paid by American on landline servi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95811518325 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54659169192 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534031413613 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.2954713769 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.285714286 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257926094727 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123268488244 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688269803356 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160211718322 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344223358621 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.