The Double line graph demonstrates the amount of recycling rate of waste recovery by million tons in U.S.A during fifty-five years age from 1960 to 2011.
According to the graph the highest collection from total waste was 86.9 million tons with 50% recycling on 2011, and the lowest waste recovery on 1960 it was 5.6 million tons with 6.4% recycled. There is slight increasing in recycling process and rubbish recovery in ten years ago (from 1975 to 1980).
To sum up, the recycling process and waste amount recovery have a significant increasing in last twenty years ago from 1990 to 2011 and the suggested reason was the technology development in USA.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: YS89
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 73
- The diagram below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature. 56
- The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 73
- Some people agree that teachers should be strict with their students; others believe that teachers with friendly approach will achieve better results. Discuss and give your opinion. 73
- The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...illustrates the total waste recovery in million tons and the percentages of wastes recy...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cling in U.S. about the interval of 1960 to 2011. It can be clearly seen that...
^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1960 to 2011. It can be clearly seen that, the waste recovery rate has a slig...
^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...seen that, the waste recovery rate has a slightly increase starting from 5.6 to 16.7 million tons ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on tons for the period of 1985 to 2011. Also, the percentages of recycling have ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...f comparison period reached to 37.7% as a highest percentage. In conclusion,...
^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ached to 37.7% as a highest percentage. In conclusion, the total waste recovery ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7125748503 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56699819306 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491017964072 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 20.3770022874 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310789841143 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178463726828 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819896737501 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212630407592 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078458793787 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.