Some people agree that teachers should be strict with their students; others believe that teachers with friendly approach will achieve better results. Discuss and give your opinion.

Everything has two sides and the educational method is not an exception. In the past, the strict method for education seemed like the most traditional way of education, but nowadays many people criticize it. In my point of view, other method of education of friendly approach is a fruitable way for the best generation of students.
It must acknowledge that many people whom specialises in the educational process or students parents believe teachers should be strict with their students for many reasons. The strict technique makes students more independent care about their subjects. In addition to forcing a students to do their homework in prospective time without any shortage. Also, the strict method supports the say of learning in childhood like a scripting on the stones, where this say will be more accurate if teachers force their student to study hard.

Nevertheless, other people agree with the friendly approach of the method of dialing between teachers and their student. However, students need some of strict, they will be more pro-active with the friendly dial with teachers. Students with this method will love the subjects and do the homework easier. Some subjects like Math requires students to be full concentrate without afraid feeling from their student to reach the level of understanding. Also, this method will avoid any psychological problems maybe occurs to students. Many studies have been issued for this debate and revealed that friendly dial achieve the better result. In addition to Parents and student's teacher Encouragements push them to be more creative. Eventually, this method encourage the student to go to their schools without absents.

Overall, people should feel free to agree or disagree on this controversial issue, but no one criticizes with our students needs more efforts from us. So, I totally support the friendly approach of the dial between teachers and their students.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
... their subjects. In addition to forcing a students to do their homework in prospective tim...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28990228013 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72022662426 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517915309446 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9060737339 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5294117647 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41176470588 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335535526361 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119967132121 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943231650978 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209656952272 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776268783147 0.056905535591 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.