The graph illustrates the total waste recovery in (million tons) and the percentages of wastes recycling in U.S. about the interval of 1960 to 2011.
It can be clearly seen that, the waste recovery rate has a slight increasing starts from 5.6 to 16.7 million tons on 1960 to 1985, respectively. While it has a gradually increasing starts from 16.7 to the peak point of 86.9 million tons for the period of 1985 to 2011.
Also, the percentages of recycling have a close trend to waste recovery for the year of 1985, where it started from 6.4% on 1960, 6.2% on 1965 reached to 10.1% on 1985. However, the percent of waste recycling trend has a sharp increase on the period of 1985 to 1995, it has a dramatic increase to the end of comparison period reached to 37.7% as a highest percentage.
In conclusion, the total waste recovery was increased in the mentioned interval, and also the waste recycling percents have the same trend.
- the development of a fishing village to the hotel resort 73
- The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 73
- the development of a fishing village to the hotel resort 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison whre relevant. 75
- the development of a fishing village to the hotel resort 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...illustrates the total waste recovery in million tons and the percentages of wastes recy...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'start'?
Suggestion: start
...e recovery rate has a slight increasing starts from 5.6 to 16.7 million tons on 1960 t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...f comparison period reached to 37.7% as a highest percentage. In conclusion, th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67272727273 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5744666997 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.0693442647 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303003759445 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170157424521 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086956718988 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206165131196 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799361695563 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.